5. "For Richer and Poorer: Teachers and Wall Street."

How would the world be if there were a limited number of teachers who are only able to work? What would children in America be doing right now without a proper education? Now just imagine if there were supporter who want to protect the wealthy class to keep most of their money  because they so call "help stimulate the economy," while teachers are getting their salary cut and losing their benefits considering they're government workers and rely on taxes. Sadly this event is already happening across the nation, teachers are being grossly undermined to how useful they are to people on wall street. Certain people who feel that we're not treating the super rich fairly because we expert them to pay more on  their taxes. Reasons behind this is consist of: loss of talent and interest in future employees for wall street,  people who work on wall street go to work  all year around in the private sector, and they don't need any kind of government assistance, which concludes they deserve to keep most of their earnings, right? Some critics justify with how much talent is needed to be a C.E.O, those individuals need the extra incentive for taking a chance to run a perplex establishment, plus they we're promised a bonus that was contractually obligated when they took on the job.  With teachers only earning $40-$50 thousands a year, we expect them to make a sacrifice in the payroll so the country as a whole can help lower the national debt. Apparently if we plan on filling up C.E.O positions in the future, we don't need good teachers to inspire youth to excel themselves, all we have to do is give them the idea that making more money means you deserve to keep it all without putting in your share.