6. Monsanto

Imagine walking down the street and a tattered man walks up to you, starts telling this morose tale about how he needs money for his family, he is down on his luck, and starving to death. Initially, the first reaction you're most likely to do is pull out your wallet and hand the poor man some money. Later on that day you see the same man, this time he is drunk, destroying things, and being a threat to the public.  Automatically your probably feel like you been bamboozled and, foolish for believing in his story. Unbelievably this scenario is similar to Mosanto's astroturfing company and campaign to cover up their true intentions. Originally Mosanto first made artificial sugar for Coke-Cola, but some how got into the biological chemical field. During WWII, this company help set up lab sites for the Manhattan Project, and created one of the most horrendous herbicide and defoliant used in the Vietnam War "Agent Orange." Since then, Mosanto has changed their field again, now a days they're a agriculture biotechnology corporation. According to Wikipedia Mosanto was Forbes "Company of the Year," in 2010. I wonder how come they don't mention that they are being sued by 300,000 farmers, or why they want to change the starndard for the word "organic." Not to mention farmers who have been using Mosanto's herbicide "Roundup Ready," has seen weeds build up a resistance to the product, which results in a plague of "superweeds" all across the Southeast and parts of the Midwest. Worst of all Mosanto encouraged farmers to only use Roundup  Ready autonomously with their crops, and blamed farmers for overuse of the herbicide. Mosanto is a company that is only worried about racking in money from the public, but not worried about how it will affect our community, so why would why trust anything they say?

5. "For Richer and Poorer: Teachers and Wall Street."

How would the world be if there were a limited number of teachers who are only able to work? What would children in America be doing right now without a proper education? Now just imagine if there were supporter who want to protect the wealthy class to keep most of their money  because they so call "help stimulate the economy," while teachers are getting their salary cut and losing their benefits considering they're government workers and rely on taxes. Sadly this event is already happening across the nation, teachers are being grossly undermined to how useful they are to people on wall street. Certain people who feel that we're not treating the super rich fairly because we expert them to pay more on  their taxes. Reasons behind this is consist of: loss of talent and interest in future employees for wall street,  people who work on wall street go to work  all year around in the private sector, and they don't need any kind of government assistance, which concludes they deserve to keep most of their earnings, right? Some critics justify with how much talent is needed to be a C.E.O, those individuals need the extra incentive for taking a chance to run a perplex establishment, plus they we're promised a bonus that was contractually obligated when they took on the job.  With teachers only earning $40-$50 thousands a year, we expect them to make a sacrifice in the payroll so the country as a whole can help lower the national debt. Apparently if we plan on filling up C.E.O positions in the future, we don't need good teachers to inspire youth to excel themselves, all we have to do is give them the idea that making more money means you deserve to keep it all without putting in your share.